Skip to content
Finitizer
Compare these two on your own workload

Published rates rank differently once prompt caching, batch discounts and your own input-to-output ratio are applied. Run both against your numbers.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-4o mini

Two established cheap models with very different output pricing.

Prices verified 30 Oct 2026

OpenAI retires GPT-4o mini on 14 Jan 2027; the named replacement is GPT-6 Luna.

Input / 1M$0.300
Output / 1M$2.50
Cached input / 1M$0.030
Batch50% off
Context1.0M tokens
Blended (3:1)$0.850
Input / 1M$0.150
Output / 1M$0.600
Cached input / 1M$0.075
Batch50% off
Context128K tokens
Blended (3:1)$0.262

Monthly cost by workload shape

The same volume costs very different amounts depending on the shape of the traffic. No caching or batch applied.

WorkloadGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o miniDifference
Support chat
200/day · 1500 in / 300 out
$7.31$2.47GPT-4o minisaves $4.84Model it →
RAG / search answers
20K/day · 3000 in / 400 out
$1,156.72$420.07GPT-4o minisaves $736.65Model it →
Agent / tool-use loop
8.0K/day · 2500 in / 600 out
$547.92$178.99GPT-4o minisaves $368.93Model it →
Batch summarization
100K/day · 5000 in / 500 out
$8,371.00$3,196.20GPT-4o minisaves $5,174.80Model it →
Code assistant
15K/day · 2000 in / 800 out
$1,187.16$356.15GPT-4o minisaves $831.01Model it →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-4o mini?

At a typical 3:1 input-to-output ratio, GPT-4o mini is cheaper: $0.262 blended per 1M tokens against $0.850. GPT-4o mini is cheaper at every input and output mix.

What is the price difference between Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-4o mini?

Gemini 2.5 Flash: $0.300 input, $2.50 output per 1M tokens. GPT-4o mini: $0.150 input, $0.600 output. That is 2.0x on input and 4.2x on output.

Does prompt caching change the answer?

Gemini 2.5 Flash caches input at $0.030/1M and GPT-4o mini caches at $0.075/1M. For input-heavy workloads with repeated context, caching can matter more than the base rate difference, model both in the calculator rather than comparing rate cards.

This page compares published prices only. It makes no claim about which model performs better on any task; that depends entirely on your evaluations.

Rate cards decide nothing on their own.

Most teams run several models at once. Finitizer Tokenomics shows what each one actually costs you, read from your own bills and exports, which workloads could test a smaller model, what they would cost on an open-weight model, and, for models you serve yourself, the cost per token beside the API price. A routing decision starts from your spend rather than a price page.

See Finitizer Tokenomics