Skip to content
Finitizer
Compare these two on your own workload

Published rates rank differently once prompt caching, batch discounts and your own input-to-output ratio are applied. Run both against your numbers.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Identical $2 / $10 list prices and cache rates, so the long-context surcharge above 272K tokens on Sol decides it.

Prices verified 12 Oct 2026
Input / 1M$2.00
Output / 1M$10.00
Cached input / 1M$0.100
Batch50% off
Context1.0M tokens
Blended (3:1)$4.00
Input / 1M$2.00
Output / 1M$10.00
Cached input / 1M$0.100
Batch50% off
Context1.1M tokens
Blended (3:1)$4.00

Monthly cost by workload shape

The same volume costs very different amounts depending on the shape of the traffic. No caching or batch applied.

WorkloadClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 SolDifference
Customer support chatbot
50K/day · 800 in / 300 out
$7,001.20$7,001.20Same costModel it →
RAG / search answers
20K/day · 3000 in / 400 out
$6,088.00$6,088.00Same costModel it →
Agent / tool-use loop
8.0K/day · 2500 in / 600 out
$2,678.72$2,678.72Same costModel it →
Batch summarization
100K/day · 5000 in / 500 out
$45.7K$45.7KSame costModel it →
Code assistant
15K/day · 2000 in / 800 out
$5,479.20$5,479.20Same costModel it →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol?

Neither, on list price: both charge $2.00 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens, so they cost the same at every input:output ratio. Caching, batch and long-context terms decide the bill.

What is the price difference between Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: $2.00 input, $10.00 output per 1M tokens. GPT-6.1 Sol: $2.00 input, $10.00 output. That is 1.0x on input and 1.0x on output.

Does prompt caching change the answer?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 caches input at $0.100/1M and GPT-6.1 Sol caches at $0.100/1M. For input-heavy workloads with repeated context, caching can matter more than the base rate difference, model both in the calculator rather than comparing rate cards.

This page compares published prices only. It makes no claim about which model performs better on any task; that depends entirely on your evaluations.

Rate cards decide nothing on their own.

Most teams run several models at once. Finitizer Tokenomics shows what each one actually costs you, read from your own bills and exports, which workloads could test a smaller model, what they would cost on an open-weight model, and, for models you serve yourself, the cost per token beside the API price. A routing decision starts from your spend rather than a price page.

See how Finitizer works